Long Document Review

Product managers receive a lengthy proposal and need to identify factual issues, structural gaps, and actionable edits, while preserving the original draft and the human confirmation process. The following approach is suitable for reports, policies, bid materials, and product proposals.

Recommended combination

• 【Conversation】: Quickly compare the review perspectives of different models;
• 【Work】Agent: Read the working directory and generate a revised draft;
• Knowledge base: Provide policies, terminology, or historical materials;
• On the right, 【Files】: Check the original draft and the output.

Policies, terminology, and historical materials can be used as knowledge base sources, while the original draft remains in a separate working directory.

① Input the original text and review criteria; ② The actual result itemizes the gaps and keeps information that cannot be confirmed as items to be checked.

Workflow

1

1. Prepare the original draft and review criteria

Put the original draft into a separate working directory, and create a brief review brief that clearly states the reader, purpose, facts that cannot be changed, and the delivery format.

2

2. First do a small-scope calibration

Choose a section and have the Agent output it in the format “issue, original text location, impact, suggestion.” Once the scale is appropriate, process the full text.

3

3. Separate facts from expression

Ask the Agent to list the facts that need verification separately, and do not use polished language to obscure uncertain content. Check key numbers against the original materials.

4

4. Generate a new file and finalize manually

Require keeping the original file, and in review/ generate the issue list and revised draft under that folder. Use the right-side 【Files】 to check paragraph by paragraph, then export or share.

Example task

Review proposal.docx in the current directory. First list factual issues, structural gaps, and expression issues by section, noting the original text location. Do not modify the original file; after confirming the list, generate a revised draft and items to verify under review/.

Preparation before use and completion criteria

Item	Recommended preparation
Files	Original text, review requirements, and output directory placed separately
Recommended combination	Dedicated Agent + working directory containing only this project's files + 【Confirm each step】
Spot-check method	Spot-check one chapter first to confirm the citation format and judgment scale
Completion criteria	Each comment includes the original text location; unread portions are clearly marked; the original file was not overwritten

Suitable for structured review of contracts, reports, papers, or specifications; when legal, medical, or financial conclusions are involved, the output can only be used as supporting material.

When the document is very long, do not repeatedly paste the full text in one conversation. Let the Agent read the working directory directly and leave intermediate outputs by chapter, which makes review and recovery easier.